At 01:00 AM 7/14/2005 -0700, you wrote:
>Dan look over this....
>http://developer.valvesoftware.com/wiki/Source_Multiplayer_Networking
>Then give a rethink of some of what you said....

        Heck, I'm suprised I came so close on some of these
assumptions I made, and thanks for the pointer.  I was basing
most of my logic on the old classic engine, and it's been
about 4 years since I've investigated its behavior.

        However, I don't see where gaming the prediction and
interpolation by cutting client-sent updates wouldn't throw
off the results.  Whether the engine would react by going more
or less in favor of one client in this case is not mentioned, nor
would I expect fine details of the server's logic.

        What has me more curious is where it states the Source
engine does entity interpolation with a 100ms delay.  I don't think
I can get to my upstream tier 2 provider in under 100ms, let
alone to a server, so right away interpolation is suspect.
That explains a lot of the oddities I see in-game, actually.
It's not the overall rate that's a problem -- I rarely see more
than 64Kbit/s inbound from most servers, it's the latency.
I'll have to experiment some, as we've a number of international
players on our servers with pings in the 120-200ms range
trying to take on 30ms players.  Improving things such that
interpolation remains accurate would be a good thing for them.

                        - Dan

* Dan Sorenson      DoD #1066      A.H.M.C. #35     [EMAIL PROTECTED] *
* Vikings?  There ain't no vikings here.  Just us honest farmers.   *
* The town was burning, the villagers were dead.  They didn't need  *
* those sheep anyway.  That's our story and we're sticking to it.   *


_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Reply via email to