Yeah I suppose, I think the different viewpoint here is you're assuming only server operators, On 1/17/06, doomed999 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't see 200+ more bugs a week posted on the list? I think mainly it
No but most server operators aren't on this list, a small fraction are. But there are over 100000 server operators out there right? And millions of users right? They'd be much more likely to respond on a web-based bug reporting system then signing up for a mail list they'd never use. > would be for us on the list, those who don't want the 200+ a week flames... Yes but that won't stop flaming in bug comments, nor would it keep eric out :) > Plus it would nice way to see if there are any status updates on the bugs I agree fully, I would like some bugzilla system > submitted. It would also be good to implement a must search before post > option. Type in your problem, if it sees no close hit then it lets them > post. > Nah. I think that more of an issue is that you'd have a lot more noise than you think. I think there should be 2 diff bugzilla, one for client problems and one for just hlds/srcds problems and make sure thats clearly defined EVERYWHERE on the site(s). Like: If you run a server report your bugs here, otherwise go here... You know what I mean. I think if you give server operators a place to report bugs you should give something equal to the clients (the majority) so they don't report bugs on the hlds bugzilla just because they don't like the alternative. -sb _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
