OK, thanks.

On Feb 4, 2006, at 10:49 AM, Alfred Reynolds wrote:

Making another page on that site for the Source RCON protocol would be
fine. The Source RCON protocol has been documented for the
community via
the hlds_apps mailing list, check out its archives.

- Alfred

Erik Hollensbe wrote:
Alfred, is it ok to post (what's been reverse-engineered of) the rcon
protocol on that page? Most of the information comes from KQuery and
the wiki there has been repeatedly vandalized (and given the amount
of time it's been in that state, I don't think it's going to change).

The information is rather hard to find (as I found when I was writing
tests for my library) and it would be nice to have a central location
for it.

On Feb 4, 2006, at 10:22 AM, Alfred Reynolds wrote:

The A2S_INFO response contains whether the server is secure or not
(see http://developer.valvesoftware.com/wiki/Source_server_queries).
Qstat should be able to make use of that data.

- Alfred

W0kk3L wrote:
Alfred,

In addition to this problem and the insecure servers, is it
possible to add the variable secure=0/1 to the query output of
SRCDS? When i query HLDS with programs like Qstat, i get info back
if a server is secure or not. SRCDS doesn't have this. If possible,
can you add this?

The reason is that i'm writing a script to restart servers if they
are insecure (like i mentioned in

http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/private/hlds_linux/2006-
February/0 74325.html).
It's almost finished, but now only works for HLDS and not for
SRCDS.

Thnx in advance

-W0kk3L-

----- Original Message -----
From: "Alfred Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2006 9:09 AM
Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] RE: Source and HL1 dedicated server Beta
available


I have found a bug with the HL1 engine beta going into secure mode
on AMD cpus (due to the different floating point behavior of those
chips). The next beta update will contain a fix for this, there is
no global work around in the mean time.

- Alfred

BIG Phil wrote:
Since the beta, VAC refuses to work and "hostname -i" returns the
public IP of the server. It is something in the beta that is
doing
it as if I roll back to version 29 VAC comes up with problems at
all.

Phil


_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

--
Erik Hollensbe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

--
Erik Hollensbe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Reply via email to