At 01:42 PM 11/5/2006, - 4ster!x - wrote:
Very sorry to add some experience data without any graphs, but I haven't had
time to set em up yet.
I thought my experiences might be of some interest anyway :

RootServer with the following configuration :

AMD Athlon64 X2 4800+ "Windsor" (as such, it comes with 2048kByte 2nd lev.
Cache)
2048 MB Kingston DDR2-667 Ram

Following are the results of the version checks :

Ubuntu 6.06.1 LTS dapper
Linux 2.6.17.13-K8 #3 SMP PREEMPT

1000 Hz support is active.

So far, we are running 2x CS:Source normal with 20 slots and 1x CS:Source
GunGame with 14 slots.

All 3 servers are running with Tickrate 100 and have 500 FPS (as u know, it
always depends on when you are giving the server the stats command, but most
of the time it will show 500 or 499).

I haven't been reported any real lag-problems, although the server will get
performance issues if running longer than 3 days without a restart (that
should be something we all know about too, I guess).

TOP is reporting as usual very weird CPU stats, being the one server at 82%
and the other two at around 60% ... connect to any of the servers and you
won't notice any performance issues tho ... so my guess is that top still is
showing totally wrong rates (and it has, imho, always been like this ;-)

Memory is no issue at all ... maximum is one of the 20 slots server using
about 20% ...

Lemme know if u wanna know anything else (BESIDES graphs, as I don't have
any yet !).

Greetinx, matteo.

After reading your reply, I was curious and attached ktrace to source
to see what it was doing. (16 man source server, full, no mods etc)

 11753 srcds_amd RET   old.recv 90/0x5a
 11753 srcds_amd CALL  mincore(0xbfbfc5c0,0)
 11753 srcds_amd RET   mincore 0
 11753 srcds_amd CALL  mincore(0xbfbfc5e0,0)
 11753 srcds_amd RET   mincore 0
 11753 srcds_amd CALL  mincore(0xbfbfc5d0,0)
 11753 srcds_amd RET   mincore 0
 11753 srcds_amd CALL  old.recv(0x5,0xbfbfb4d0)
 11753 srcds_amd RET   old.recv -1 errno -11 Unknown error: -11
 11753 srcds_amd CALL  old.recv(0xa,0xbfbfb520)
 11753 srcds_amd RET   old.recv -1 errno -11 Unknown error: -11
 11753 srcds_amd CALL  old.recv(0xc,0xbfbe4da0)
 11753 srcds_amd RET   old.recv -1 errno -11 Unknown error: -11
 11753 srcds_amd CALL  mincore(0xbfbfb520,0)
 11753 srcds_amd RET   mincore 0
 11753 srcds_amd CALL  getdomainname(0xbfbfc860,0)
 11753 srcds_amd RET   getdomainname 0
 11753 srcds_amd CALL  old.gethostid(0x1,0xbfbfc6a0,0,0,0xbfbfc618)
 11753 srcds_amd RET   old.gethostid 1
 11753 srcds_amd CALL  #175(0,0xbfbfc620,0,0x8)
 11753 srcds_amd RET   #175 0
 11753 srcds_amd CALL  old.gethostid(0x1,0xbfbfc6a0,0,0,0xbfbfc610)
 11753 srcds_amd RET   old.gethostid 1
 11753 srcds_amd CALL  read(0,0xbfbfc60f,0x1)

Curious to why it's using older syscalls, maybe it's just the linux
emulatin layer on freebsd.

A rundown of syscalls for a 1 second kdump (number of calls per
second (estimated))

old.recv          12162/s
mincore           9592/s
old.gethostid     3720/s
getdomainname 1875/s

gethostid() according to gethostid(3) says it has been deprecated

Does source really need to call getdomainname 1800 times a second? :)







_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Reply via email to