Assuming your comments are true...why do clients buy the 1000fps if they are given the choice between all of the above and test all of the above? One thing I've learned in this business is that theoretical performance is less important than the actual performance the client sees. If what you say is true, clients would not buy the 1000fps because they would find "lower performance" than a lower fps server. This sounds like a lot of sour grapes...I question $1/slot servers as well but I'm not crying about it on this mailing list...
> Couldn't agree more. 1000 fps is a waste of cpu time for an HL1 server > (that's what I have most of my experience with). All it does is make it > more difficult to maintain a stable server, and if what that article > says is true, it actually makes hit reg worse. > >> >> Server companies that sell "1000fps servers" have always been >> questionable >> IMO. _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
