As far as I know the socket 771 Xeon does use about 40% less power then the
775 ones.
-LeAdGuEsT
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ondřej Hošek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2007 3:08 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] srcds performance on Xeon quad core?
Actually, the technical difference between Xeon and Core 2 is minimal.
AFAIK, a Xeon is slightly better than the equivalent Core 2 Extreme, but
I haven't done much research.
~~ Ondra
On 11.11.07 13:54 Uhr, Crazy Canucks wrote:
I thought the Core 2 processors (can't find the name of the quad
equivalent) were better on power consumption than Xeon processors. As
far as I know, even the quad core AMD's are better on power consumption
than Xeons. Someone correct me if I am wrong please... :)
Drek
Adam James wrote:
I'm currently looking at 1U rack mount systems to host some TF2
servers. Power consumption is a big factor in long term costs, so I'm
looking for a system with an optimum power to speed ratio.
At the moment, a system with a quad core Xeon X3220 2.4GHz CPU seems to
be optimal. Would it be possible to run 4 x 24 slot TF2 servers with
decent performance on this hardware?
If someone could share their experiences of running srcds instances on
similar hardware, I'd be most grateful.
--atj
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
