Like you say - it depends on the email client...
On 7/9/08, Ondřej Hošek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Actually, I doubt that's what defines a thread. You should rather look > into the headers of messages past, where you can see an obvious > In-Reply-To. This cool header is the backbone of threaded views in mail > clients, and is respected by them when the reader presses the "Reply" > button. > > This makes such cool things like changing the subject from > [ut3] Linux client > to > [ut3] Epic doesn't care (was: Linux client) > work without breaking the thread. However, the final call lies with your > mail client. > > ~~ Ondra > > On 09.07.08 23:25 Uhr, Patrick Shelley wrote: > > The reason you method posted a new thread is because you changed the > > subject. The subject was new to the list so it created a new thread. > > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
