Hey Neph, You've tried using the fps_max command right? Kyle.
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Crazy Canucks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Ah, I missed that. Nothing is ever as simple as it seems... > > Drek > > Nephyrin Zey wrote: > > If you read my previous email, that was because of a plugin i had > > running that i then removed and provided a snapshot without it, but > > with the same problem. > > > > I can't even get consistant 100FPS with 32 people in a SourceTV > > server, on a 2.4GHz Xeon. That's the issue. > > > > On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 11:29 AM, ics <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> I sort of had that feeling too. I've been only running server with 100, > >> 250 and 1000Hz kernels and those give 50, 120 and 500fps give or take. > >> So far 1000Hz gives best performance under heavy load (lots happening > >> in-game), rest just peak CPU to the roof time to time and cause > glitching. > >> > >> -ics > >> > >> Crazy Canucks kirjoitti: > >> > >>> Am I the only one that thinks the almost 100% cpu load might have > >>> something to do with the almost 4000 fps the server appears to be > >>> running at? > >>> > >>> Drek > >>> > >>> Gary Stanley wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>> At 03:36 AM 8/28/2008, Nephyrin Zey wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> I've complained before about how srcds chugs massive amounts of CPU, > but > >>>>> now that I've enabled SourceTV it's gotten absolutely absurd. Here is > my > >>>>> server idling, while my monitoring system polls it once a minute for > CPU > >>>>> usage. The server is *empty*, with no bots, with just SourceTV on. > >>>>> SourceTV is autorecording, but turning this off has a small effect. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>>> CPU In Out Uptime Users FPS Players > >>>>> 99.90 0.00 0.00 1556 14 3831.42 0 > >>>>> rcon from "75.125.209.6:38438": command "stats" > >>>>> CPU In Out Uptime Users FPS Players > >>>>> 11.00 0.00 0.00 1557 14 3378.38 0 > >>>>> rcon from "75.125.209.6:38442": command "stats" > >>>>> CPU In Out Uptime Users FPS Players > >>>>> 23.80 0.00 0.00 1558 14 3802.28 0 > >>>>> rcon from "75.125.209.6:54402": command "stats" > >>>>> CPU In Out Uptime Users FPS Players > >>>>> 99.90 0.00 0.00 1559 14 1782.53 0 > >>>>> rcon from "75.125.209.6:54406": command "stats" > >>>>> CPU In Out Uptime Users FPS Players > >>>>> 9.00 0.00 0.00 1560 14 673.40 0 > >>>>> rcon from "75.125.209.6:54410": command "stats" > >>>>> > >>>>> A process monitor shows this server idling at 25-28% of the core it's > >>>>> assigned to. > >>>>> > >>>>> I'm not doing any special boosting, but i am using a 2.6.26 kernel > >>>>> (which has the new cpu sched, and such). I've tried 300hz and 1000hz, > >>>>> tickless, preempt on off, and realtime kernels, and found that they > all > >>>>> have relatively minor effects on CPU usage. Turning off high > precision > >>>>> timers + turning kernel hz to 100, so the system cannot achieve > higher > >>>>> than 100fps, results in moderately less CPU usage, and a performance > hit. > >>>>> > >>>>> So what am I going to do? The windows srcds has moderately better CPU > >>>>> usage, but I run a quadcore linux system that also provides other > >>>>> services, and can't easily switch. > >>>>> > >>>>> More worrying: the windows srcds 'unboosted' uses TINY (like <20% of > a > >>>>> core FULL) amounts of CPU. It gets 66fps, sure, but my servers dip as > >>>>> low as 66fps when they're at 100% bloody CPU usage! > >>>>> > >>>>> Is this ever going to be looked at? Am I doing it wrong? > >>>>> > >>>>> - Neph > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> Have you tried an older kernel? I don't see those issues (at all). > >>>> However, I have plenty of hacks in place in kernel/time.c to make > >>>> gettimeofday() return for speed, no accuracy (saves a couple mpy and > >>>> divl cycles), and i don't use 2.6.26 series on my development stuff. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > >>>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > >>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > >>> > >>> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > >> > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

