Brings it any advantage? I think pb3 isn't useful because system is already boosted.
Am I wrong? Kveri Matthias Bleile wrote / napísal(a): > Why is it that bad to run pb3? > Just because of the CPU Usage? - We live in 2008 :) > Or do you know any disadvantages? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Kveri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list" > <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 7:03 PM > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] sys_ticrate > > > DO NOT use sys_ticrate 10000. Max sys_ticrate 1000 w/ -pingboost 3. But > if you have 1000Hz kernel you're good without pingboost (because > pingboost is a workaround for 100Hz kernels and achieves more than > 100fps), I'm running 1000Hz kernel with HPET, -pingboost 0 (same as w/o > -pingboost) and sys_ticrate 1000 => 995fps stable. > > Kveri > > Javi Martín wrote / napísal(a): > >> Hello. >> >> I want to set in my servers -pingboost 3 with sys_ticrate 10000 without >> accelerations, to get 1000 fps stable. >> >> I saw servers with this, but their owners don´t want to tell me the method >> XD. >> >> Any idea for this? >> >> Sorry for my bad english. >> >> Kind Regards. >> >> Javier. >> _______________________________________________ >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >> please visit: >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux >> >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please > visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
