Hi,

O SHI-.. Im so scared...

And who said anything that anticheat should always ban cheaters? EAC 
works similar way than C-D, it prevents playing if you have 
modifications but wont ban you unless the detection is 100% sure.

Tom Leighton kirjoitti:
> So you have just admitted to reverse engineering VAC, which is a part of 
> STEAM.
> This is a violation of the SSA and you are lucky if your Steam account 
> is not disabled.
> /
> /
>
> /    E. Restrictions./
>
> /    Except as otherwise permitted under Section 2(C) with regard to the 
> SDK, you may not, in whole or in part, copy, photocopy, reproduce,     
> translate, reverse engineer, derive source code, modify, disassemble, 
> decompile, create derivative works based on, or remove any             
>     proprietary notices or labels from the Steam Software or any 
> software accessed via Steam without the prior consent, in writing, of 
> Valve./
>
>
>
> The reason I said that we don't know how VAC works is WE DONT. The 
> things that we do know are that it works off of some kind of checksums, 
> which is the only way that it could not produce false positives.
>
> Being an anticheat developer myself, I wouldn't even think about making 
> the one I work on support any VAC games, because the risk is far too 
> high. We will be sticking to older games and games which use punkbuster 
> (Which can definately be turned off).
>
> Donnie Newlove wrote:
>   
>> I do not believe that is a secret, but that how they can be certain
>> that VAC does not produce false positives.
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Valtteri Kiviniemi
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>   
>>     
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Of course it would tell via rcon say or some other way that server is
>>> not secure anymore and then maybe do quick reboot for the server.
>>>
>>> And I know how VAC work because I am developing anticheat so I have of
>>> course looked into VAC. And so does anyone else who has some asm/c/c++
>>> coding skills and wants to find out. Im not telling any specific details
>>> about it, but I can tell that i'ts not very efficient and it does only
>>> detect hacks which hashes it has on its database. So it's not really a
>>> real time scan/protection against hacks because it needs to have the
>>> hack what you are using in its database so it protects you for known
>>> public hacks etc.
>>>
>>> Tom Leighton kirjoitti:
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> Don't mind me, but that would enable people to be playing a match and
>>>> then VAC to be disabled when it starts... leading to people believing it
>>>> is vac secured when it is not.
>>>>
>>>> Also, I wouldn't trust ANY other program to "Protect my game from
>>>> kernelhacks and aimbots", simply because we don't know how VAC works and
>>>> I really do not want to piss it off...
>>>>
>>>> Valtteri Kiviniemi wrote:
>>>>
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Could it be possible to add a cvar like sv_secure that would specify if
>>>>> server is secure or not. I mean that you could disable or enable VAC via
>>>>> cvar without having to restart the server. Or if that's not possible,
>>>>> maybe add a command that would disable or enable VAC and reboot
>>>>> automatically the server.
>>>>>
>>>>> The reason why im asking this is because we are developing a anticheat
>>>>> called EasyAntiCheat ( http://www.easyanticheat.net/ ) which is not
>>>>> compatible with VAC. And some customer wants to disable EAC and use VAC2
>>>>> (mainly because of some foreign CUP's that are not aware of EAC and
>>>>> requires server to be VAC2 enabled).
>>>>>
>>>>> So it would be easier to customers if they just could enable or disable
>>>>> VAC if wanted to.
>>>>>
>>>>> Just a suggestion.
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, 
>>>>> please visit:
>>>>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>         
>>>>>           
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, 
>>>> please visit:
>>>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>>>>
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, 
>>> please visit:
>>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>>>
>>>     
>>>       
>> _______________________________________________
>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, 
>> please visit:
>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>>
>>   
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
> visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>   


-- 
Ystävällisin terveisin,

Dataproof
Aleksanterinkatu 7 A 14
15110 LAHTI
puh. 0405166397

Valtteri Kiviniemi


_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Reply via email to