Hi, No one is saying that it wouldn't run flawlessly, just pointing out that if you are setuping a new server for virtualized scrcds, I would choose Xen for that purpose.
I think that ESXi is so popular because its easier to install. Community version of Xen needs a lot of more skill to setup than ESXi, but its worth it. - Valtteri Kiviniemi William Warren kirjoitti: > On 8/25/2009 11:07 AM, Claudio Beretta wrote: >> HiI'd like to know your experiences with running srcds in a virtualized >> environment. Searching mail-archive for past discussions about this subject >> didn't provide a reliable conclusion to this topic. >>> From what i understand, only hypervisors such as ESXi, XEN (and maybe >> Hyper-V) are suitable to be used for game servers because they should be the >> ones that introduce the lower overhead and response delay. >> Having a minor performance loss is fine, as long as no noticeable jitter is >> introduced or ping is increased.Has anyone had a chance to test these >> products and compare srcds performance on the same machine when virtualized >> and when running on the bare metal? >> Provided that the machine can handle it, do you know if it is possible to >> virtualize tickrate100, 1000fps CSS servers? Not that i want to do that, but >> if it can be done.. anything can be done :-) >> >> best regards, >> Claudio >> _______________________________________________ >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >> please visit: >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux >> >> >> > I run my srcds inside of centos 5 that runs inside an exsi host and it > runs flawlessly. > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please > visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
