On Thursday 31 July 2008 04:06:20 Jan Dvorak wrote: > Hi, Hi > have anyone tried CLFS with HLFS patches any recently? It's not a easy task. I try only try some things.
> Is it buildable? Yes, it is. But I think you will neeed change and/or create some patches. I'm just a month to start try build a new version of my LFS, which have some portions of the HLFS user space hardennings (Stack Guard). I want to put regparm on system and, to me, it's appear to be necessary to do some arcane stuffs to enable this on non regparm, so I'm studing CLFS to undestand how to build a system with diferents arch and get some tip (perhaps the glibc "no link with libgcc_s" patch &-) ) I'll do some test in 64 bits and add others hardenings from HLFS, too. > How less hardened would that be? So hardened than a HLFS. :-) It's mainly depend the hardenings you can port to CLFS. I think you must start with a CLFS stable and after be well succeed here (if you have not been succeed) and than port step-by-step some features of HLFS. Remeber HLFS is not considered stable so, I suggest do it in parts, I could start applying stack guard, then Fortify Code, then strl* patches , etc. Saving a whole grsecurity/RSBAC/PaX hardening to the end. I hope this can help you, it's only suggestions. > > Thanks for opinions. > > PS. Sorry for the wrong Subject. No problem -- Valter Douglas Lisbôa Jr. Sócio-Diretor Trenix - IT Solutions "Nossas Idéias, suas Soluções!" www.trenix.com.br [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel. +55 19 3402.2957 Cel. +55 19 9183.4244 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/hlfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
