On Friday 01 August 2008 13:18:41 Valter Douglas Jr. wrote:
> On Friday 01 August 2008 03:56:49 Jan Dvorak wrote:
> > On Thursday 31 July 2008 17:12:31 Valter Douglas Jr. wrote:
> > > Aside 64 bits system has more bugs than 32, it could
> > > be a good candidate to not have throubles (except when you mix it
> > > with Xen, nasty thing). [talking about PaX]
> >
> > Can you go more into details?
>
> The big problem is the patching, Xen patchs modify heavely some parts
> of the kernel, and one of this parts is heavely modified by PaX. I try
> for two weeks to merge both patches on Kernel 2.6.18 without success
> (I'm not a kernel hacker, yet), I can not just make it compile. I'll
> try to mix it again using a 2.6.26.x kernel like a DOMU with the PaX
> patches.
I see now. I'm glad I dumped Xen.
Thanks,
Mordae
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/hlfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
