Hi, I had a go at building this today and came across a build failure.
Everything upto and including Chapter 6.11 built exactly as expected. Chapter 6.12 (Binutils) is where I hit the snag. The actual build of Binutils is fine. Running the testsuite had the following result : binutils test - OK gas tests - OK ld tests - Failed For test elfvsb.exp : FAIL: visibility (hidden) (non PIC) FAIL: visibility (hidden) (non PIC, load offset) FAIL: visibility (hidden) (PIC main, non PIC so) FAIL: visibility (hidden_normal) (non PIC) FAIL: visibility (hidden_normal) (non PIC, load offset) FAIL: visibility (hidden_normal) (PIC main, non PIC so) FAIL: visibility (hidden_undef_def) (non PIC) FAIL: visibility (hidden_undef_def) (non PIC, load offset) FAIL: visibility (hidden_undef_def) (PIC main, non PIC so) FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) (non PIC) FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) (non PIC, load offset) FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) (PIC main, non PIC so) FAIL: visibility (protected) (non PIC) FAIL: visibility (protected) (non PIC, load offset) FAIL: visibility (protected) (PIC main, non PIC so) FAIL: visibility (protected_undef_def) (non PIC) FAIL: visibility (protected_undef_def) (non PIC, load offset) FAIL: visibility (protected_undef_def) (PIC main, non PIC so) FAIL: visibility (protected_weak) (non PIC) FAIL: visibility (protected_weak) (non PIC, load offset) FAIL: visibility (protected_weak) (PIC main, non PIC so) FAIL: visibility (normal) (non PIC) FAIL: visibility (normal) (non PIC, load offset) FAIL: visibility (normal) (PIC main, non PIC so) For test elfweak.exp : FAIL: ELF DSO weak data first DSO FAIL: ELF DSO weak data last DSO FAIL: ELF DSO weak data first DSO common FAIL: ELF DSO weak data last DSO common For test shared.exp : FAIL: shared (non PIC) FAIL: shared (non PIC, load offset) FAIL: shared (PIC main, non PIC so) Finally on test srec.exp : FAIL: S-records with constructors It then fails at the end of the ld test section. I've backtracked and checked all the edits I made, they look fine. The configparms file at 6.9 (Glibc) was copied and pasted due to its size and complexity, so Im confident with that. Any thoughts on what may be causing this, or if I have missed a typo somewhere ? Thanks, Steve. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/hlfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
