On Wednesday 23 February 2011 15:45:27 Mr. T wrote: > On 23/02/2011 04:47, Mr. T wrote: > > On 23/02/2011 03:21, Robert Connolly wrote: > >>>> The 'make CC="gcc -O2 -fno-stack-protector -nopie -fno-PIE" check' > >>>> should cover this. > >>>> > >>>> Please send me ld/ld.log. Also, is this a i686 or an x86_64? > >>>> > >>>> robert > >>> > >>> I've attached ld.log as requested and also the actual build log from > >>> binutils itself. > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> > >>> Steve > >> > >> Try with this: > >> make check \ > >> > >> CC="gcc -O2 -fno-stack-protector -nopie -fno-PIE > >> -no-warn-shared-textrel" > >> > >> Maybe add -no-fatal-warnings if needed. > >> > >> robert > > > > I'll give this a go shortly and report back the result. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Steve. > > Well this improves things a fair bit. > > Using either of the above, only the 'S-records with constructors' test > fails. (ld-srec/srec.exp) > > Steve.
The ld/ld.log file needs to be looked at to see why that test is failing. If we can fix it then I'll add the differences to the book. robert
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/hlfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page