> Mine waned when I realized the results would be running in the Flash  
> plugin, quite possibly the most godawful-bad piece of software on OS  
> X. :)
>

Please explain why you think it is awful, especially on MacOS X? Seems
to me one BIG advantage is that all the browser compatibility issues
go away. Flash 9 is on +95% of all computers.

> The biggest downside of the YAML model definition, to me, is that  
> YAML's not Ruby. The association macros in Rails are incredibly  
> powerful, vs. the very simple ones supported in YAML. It's a common  
> problem when trying to interchange model representation across a  
> limited medium.
>

As I understand it, the YAML definition model in RestfulX, is simply
translated into migrations. I guess you could apply a diff on each
edit to figure out which new migrations to generate, much like the
current Hobo approach. But I like the fact that the complete model is
centralized and can be edited from there. Hard to get an overview of
the model relationships otherwise.
I was thinking it could be a nice way to generate updates to the
model .rb files from a central YAML file (the fields section), so
keeping the Ruby model representation...
Datamapper ORM also has fields in the model... so could be one YAML
model for several ORM-like approaches. Or just generate the YAML from
the schema for an easy overview using a rake task!?

> The idea of extending Hobo to make it more frontend-agnostic is  
> interesting, but I'm not clear how useful it actually will be in  
> practice. I know that the last time I went spelunking in the DRYML  
> parser, I thought I was going to be eaten by a grue.. ;)
>

Read my DRYML chapter in the Hobo book. I think I got a pretty good
understanding of how it works by now. No reason to go into the DRYML
parser as I see it, that works just fine. I will refator the DRYML
engine to be more frontend-agnostic and not hardcoded to nested
concats, when I get the time (this week perhaps!)


> Ultimately it will come down to necessity - if somebody gets a client  
> who's hell-bent on a Flex app and Hobo (no idea how that would happen,  
> but anyway...), then it will likely be built. Otherwise, not so much...
>

I will give it a try after New Year. My goals: ExtJS, Flex, PDF.


> --Matt Jones

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hobo 
Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/hobousers?hl=en.


Reply via email to