Hi Tiago,
I definitely have no problem putting url.rb into hobo-contrib as is.
I'd take further direction from Tom before putting it into Hobo itself.
One concern I have is your to_html function. Sometimes to_html
is used inside links, so putting a link inside a link is well,
problematic. I would probably replace to_html with a <def tag="view"
for="URL">...
Bryan
Tiago Franco wrote:
Hi,
Spiralis, thanks for the reply. Yep, I was looking for a rich type
with validation.
I've uploaded url.rb to the Google Group's files.
Tom et al, please feel free to include it in Hobo. Let me know if I
can help with that (committing, updating documentation, etc.).
Regards,
TF
On Mar 19, 2:29 pm, Spiralis <[email protected]> wrote:
I personally just use a string, but you are perhaps looking for
validations++?
~Ronny
On 18 Mar, 19:48, Tiago Franco <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
I've noticed that there is no URL type on hobo fields.
Can I had it? :)
TF
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hobo
Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/hobousers?hl=en.
