good point! On Mar 19, 2:56 pm, Bryan Larsen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Tiago, > > I definitely have no problem putting url.rb into hobo-contrib as is. > I'd take further direction from Tom before putting it into Hobo itself. > One concern I have is your to_html function. Sometimes to_html > is used inside links, so putting a link inside a link is well, > problematic. I would probably replace to_html with a <def tag="view" > for="URL">... > > Bryan > > > > Tiago Franco wrote: > > Hi, > > > Spiralis, thanks for the reply. Yep, I was looking for a rich type > > with validation. > > > I've uploaded url.rb to the Google Group's files. > > > Tom et al, please feel free to include it in Hobo. Let me know if I > > can help with that (committing, updating documentation, etc.). > > > Regards, > > TF > > > On Mar 19, 2:29 pm, Spiralis <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I personally just use a string, but you are perhaps looking for > >> validations++? > > >> ~Ronny > > >> On 18 Mar, 19:48, Tiago Franco <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> Hi, > >>> I've noticed that there is no URL type on hobo fields. > >>> Can I had it? :) > >>> TF
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hobo Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hobousers?hl=en.
