I would give the final call to what your production environment is going to be. That way, there's no cross platform surprises when it comes to deploying (like gems or libraries that are difficult).
On Mar 12, 8:55 pm, Jae Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have been a .net developer since 2001 and therefore my daily > operating system is Windows 7. > To play with Hobo, I have installed ruby, rails and Hobo in Windows 7 > with no issues. Also, I have installed all of the same components in > Ubuntu 9.10 as well. > > From your daily real experience as a Ruby on Rails & Hobo developer, > do you still recommend Windows 7 platform? I heard that some > plugins / gems can not be installed in Windows environment. > > What I have installed in my Windows 7 were Ruby 1.8.6, Rails 2.3.5, > Hobo 1.0, SQLite3, Formtastic, Niffty-Generators, Ruby-Debug 0.9.3, > and NotePad++. I have installed the same components in Ubuntu, and > it looks like they all run faster in Linux environment too. > > My intention is to keep one single O/S around me if possible, and I am > still leaning forward Windows vs Ubuntu but need to hear your > professional advice on this ;-) > > ~~~~~~~ > > Also, what other plugins or gems do you frequently use with Hobo? > Besides paperclip, I'd like to know what other gems are widely used > with Hobo to build your applications. > > Thank you again for your valuable comments! > > Jae -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hobo Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hobousers?hl=en.
