Sstill struggling here....can't find any examples of can_view?
anywhere...
from what i can work out, given that <table-plus> merges <table> i
think it *should* be ok to do the following...
<table-plus with="&@contact.calls" fields="created_at, this">
<tr:><view if="&can_view?"/></tr:>
<header: replace/>
</table-plus>
but it leads to weird output - the viewable row(s) get rendered
*above* the <table-plus> header row, and there are no data rows in the
table-plus???
On 3 July, 14:10, storitel <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thank you very much for this - I've now fixed the field-level issue as
> kevin suggested - the following skips the count field if not
> viewable...
>
> <table-plus fields="this, calls.count, user">
> <calls-count-heading:>Calls</calls-count-heading:>
> <calls-count-view:><view if="&can_view?"/></calls-count-view:>
> </table-plus>
>
> could you more specific on how to solve the row-level case? i'm
> struggling to figure out the syntax for using can_view? to get table-
> plus to skip rows that are not viewable...
>
> also i'd be interested to know how to do the viewable check in the
> association itself?
>
> sorry if these questions seem basic...
> thanks again
> Paul
>
> On 2 July, 10:12, Bernhard Leicher <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > On 1 Jul., 13:40, Matt Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Yep - it's a bug.
>
> > >https://hobo.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8324/tickets/726
>
> > > using can_view?(this) instead will make it work for now.
>
> > Thank you!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hobo
Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/hobousers?hl=en.
