try <tr: replace> <tr restore if="&can_view?(this)" /> </tr:>
On Jul 7, 3:39 pm, storitel <[email protected]> wrote: > i did try that, but > > attribute 'if' is not allowed on parameter tags (<tr:>) -- at app/ > views/contacts/show.dryml:64 > > so then i messed around with > > <tr:> > <if test="&can_view?(this)"> > hello > </if> > </tr:> > > the result is I get hello repeated as many times as there are viewable > records, *followed* by the header row of the table-plus. definitely > not expected behaviour. > > On 7 July, 18:54, kevinpfromnm <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > no, you want something like <tr: if="&can_view?(this)" /> > > > On Jul 4, 1:00 pm, storitel <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Sstill struggling here....can't find any examples of can_view? > > > anywhere... > > > > from what i can work out, given that <table-plus> merges <table> i > > > think it *should* be ok to do the following... > > > > <table-plus with="&[email protected]" fields="created_at, this"> > > > <tr:><view if="&can_view?"/></tr:> > > > <header: replace/> > > > </table-plus> > > > > but it leads to weird output - the viewable row(s) get rendered > > > *above* the <table-plus> header row, and there are no data rows in the > > > table-plus??? > > > > On 3 July, 14:10, storitel <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Thank you very much for this - I've now fixed the field-level issue as > > > > kevin suggested - the following skips the count field if not > > > > viewable... > > > > > <table-plus fields="this, calls.count, user"> > > > > <calls-count-heading:>Calls</calls-count-heading:> > > > > <calls-count-view:><view if="&can_view?"/></calls-count-view:> > > > > </table-plus> > > > > > could you more specific on how to solve the row-level case? i'm > > > > struggling to figure out the syntax for using can_view? to get table- > > > > plus to skip rows that are not viewable... > > > > > also i'd be interested to know how to do the viewable check in the > > > > association itself? > > > > > sorry if these questions seem basic... > > > > thanks again > > > > Paul > > > > > On 2 July, 10:12, Bernhard Leicher <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > On 1 Jul., 13:40, Matt Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Yep - it's a bug. > > > > > > >https://hobo.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8324/tickets/726 > > > > > > > using can_view?(this) instead will make it work for now. > > > > > > Thank you! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hobo Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hobousers?hl=en.
