dd: Thanks, but I find it a bit intrusive to have to do that. I have made a rich type myself (money) that I have used for some time and it is as you say not that difficult. Except, subclassing another existing hobo type I think could be difficult. For my app, in 1.3, I have added this file as an initializer - as I recall having read that that was the recommended way to do it. However, when the initializer is, well - initialized, the hobo types aren't available.
Matt: Thanks! That worked - excellent. So, the general rule is to use the underscore version of the type then? ~Ronny -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hobo Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hobousers?hl=en.
