> Can you also say the opposite that rotocols developed for wireless work > equally well also for wired environments ? If so let me ask why do we > need both classes of routing protocols ?
I would argue that the OSPF MANET extensions would work just as well for IS-IS or OSPF in both wirelss and wired networks. > If not I am not sure homenet should focus on wireless router to router > communication at all. Yes I am in favor of wired env with fiber or with > nice cat 7 wiring between my routers. I am as well, but I think we should allow for both with a single protocol as much as possible. I think OSPF or IS-IS (or even EIGRP) can be adapted to the low power/lossy network situation, it just takes some thought and care. Russ _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet