> Can you also say the opposite that rotocols developed for wireless work
> equally well also for wired environments ? If so let me ask why do we
> need both classes of routing protocols ?

I would argue that the OSPF MANET extensions would work just as well for
IS-IS or OSPF in both wirelss and wired networks.

> If not I am not sure homenet should focus on wireless router to router
> communication at all. Yes I am in favor of wired env with fiber or with
> nice cat 7 wiring between my routers.

I am as well, but I think we should allow for both with a single
protocol as much as possible. I think OSPF or IS-IS (or even EIGRP) can
be adapted to the low power/lossy network situation, it just takes some
thought and care.

Russ

_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
homenet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to