On 10/03/2011 02:35 PM, Tony Li wrote:
> LS protocols give every router a full picture of the topology, so the
> diversity is apparent to all nodes.
My point was just that wireless has a set of challenges that all may not
be familiar with; knowing that may help point the discussion in fruitful
ways. Routing isn't my area of expertise (though I have scars on my
back from it in wireless...).
- Jim
>
> Tony
>
>
> On Oct 3, 2011, at 11:28 AM, Jim Gettys wrote:
>
>> I think there is another set of routing issues that most have not
>> thought about unless they have had experience with wireless networking;
>> that is the possible need for diversity aware routing.
>>
>> See:
>>
>> http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~jch/software/babel/wbmv4.pdf
>> <http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/%7Ejch/software/babel/wbmv4.pdf>
>>
>> For an introduction to the topic, and some work in the area (e.g. babelz).
>>
>> In my house, for example, I have great trouble getting wires where all I
>> need them, and I need multiple access points. I'd like to put one out
>> in the pool shed, and I really can't get wires out there (without digging).
>>
>> This may or may not be orthogonal to the routing requirements to support
>> multi-homing and multiple providers, but is something that many/most
>> routing protocols have not dealt with in the past.
>> - Jim
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtgwg mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
