Agreed. Another idea is this: Do we also need any features like mobile ad hoc networking (e.g. OLSR) in homenet?
RRR -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Fred Baker Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2011 9:50 AM To: Lorenzo Colitti Cc: Pascal Thubert (pthubert); C Chauvenet; Randy Turner; MANET IETF; Mark Townsley; JP Vasseur; Acee Lindem; Qiong; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [homenet] Question for you On Oct 4, 2011, at 12:50 AM, Lorenzo Colitti wrote: > For example, if there were a robust open-source version of IS-IS that didn't > take up too much RAM and flash, you could define TLVs to implement zeroconf > and you could get to something that works relatively quickly. RFC 1453 specified a default OSPF configuration that my (ACC) Router came up with by default. The only configuration necessary was to supply IPv4 prefixes/addresses to the interfaces and to turn OSPF on. In the context of a home, I suspect it would be pretty close. Fundamentals: default values for most attributes are as specified in the OSPF RFC, the metric is the duration of a bit in 10 ns units (which in LAN networks becomes a hop count), and all interfaces are in area zero. Change things to your heart's content, but the default configuration is one that actually works for most purposes in a small network. I'll entertain arguments that this doesn't address every possible configuration, but for the networks we're discussing, I'll argue that its "close enough". _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
