On 10/13/2011 02:42 PM, Curtis Villamizar wrote:
>
> Yes and there are/were ATM switches that implement RFC1577, LANE,
> MPOA, and NHRP. None of that worked very well and it all is
> essentially abandoned work now. Pre-existence alone is not a worth
> while evaluation criteria.
>
> If zOSPF works perfectly, including in the presence of legacy routers
> which don't look at a new 48 bit mac address router-id extension, we
> have no reason to continue the discussion. We just indicate "use
> zOSPF" and we're done.
>
> There seems to be consensus that we're not done.
>
On my part, I'm interested in understanding the following:
o scaling properties: I worry about the apartment building case, and
related dense mesh case.
o behaviour when routing both wired and wireless networks.
o multicast behaviour and impact on wireless networks.
o running code
And I'll ask the same about any other routing protocol you wish to
name. I'm an equal opportunity parade rainer...
- Jim
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
