On 27 Mar 2012, at 23:12, Thomas Herbst wrote: > "Fully stable" would be static and I don't think anyone is suggesting > static. While devices must be able to survive address changes, they > should not have to change addresses frequently.
<nohat> How often is "frequently"? I know of at least one ISP who gives a _dynamic_ /64 to every DSL customer that happens to negotiate IP6CP that changes each time they connect. > Using ULA's and the availability of Global addressing are orthogonal > issues. +1 Ray > _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
