On 2012-03-22 12:33, homenet issue tracker wrote: > #4: Use of ULAs > > CN1 in the -02 text says ULAs should be provisioned by default. Do we > agree?
Yes, by the CER (MUST). It's much less clear for all other routers on site. I would prefer that no other router provisions a ULA prefix if the CER has already delegated one. > And if so, should they be preferred over globals? Yes. > The new > 3484-bis has changed so they are not *unless* a specific /48 for the site > is added to the 3484 policy table with higher precedence than globals. We > should design something that works when disconnected from the Internet. We'll have to deal with whatever 3484bis ends up saying. If it does require an explicit policy table entry table, that will require a mechanism, associated with the prefix delegation mechanism. > Also, we currently say nothing about ULA-only devices and their > reachability from outside the homenet; do we want to? I don't see what there is to say; they aren't reachable, and that's a feature. Brian _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
