On Mon, 9 Jul 2012, Jari Arkko wrote:

Hi,

We've submitted a new version of our OSPFv3-based prefix assignment draft. This version adds quite a bit of detail to the algorithm, describes ULA prefix generation, etc.

Here's the link:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-arkko-homenet-prefix-assignment-02

Comments appreciated.

Hi,

I haven't really read up what has been discussed historically here, so please have patience in case I am rehashing what has already been discussed.

From reading the text it is not clear to me exactly what deployment
scenario the text is meant to handle. Some ascii drawings might help? I've been pondering how to solve a few different problems for deployment, for instance the problem of the customer having a CPE with a live DHCPv6-PD prefix, unplugging it by means of power-off, and then putting in another CPE. If only a single prefix is allowed on the link, then the customer would have to wait until the PD lease expires until the new CPE can get one (the same problem exists for IPv4 as well, in case only a single IPv4 address is allowed and the customer just powers off the CPE without doing DHCP RELEASE first).

I've been considering allowing 4 concurrent PD prefixes, for instance the customer has a statically configured /56 as PD pool, a /64 on-link (which is not from the /56 space), and then handing out /58 with PD from the customer-unique /56. This would mean that the deployment scenario might in worse case look like this:

ISP handoff switch/router
          |/64
  -----customer switch----------------
  |      |      |         |      |   |
 CPE1  CPE2   CPE3      CPE4    PC1 PC2
 /58PD /58PD  /58PD     /58PD
  |      |      |---|
 L2    CPE5   CPE6 CPE7
  |      |      |   |
 PC3    PC4   PC5  PC6

This is in a ETTH scenario, or could also be over for instance DSL where the modem is a bridged L2 handoff. To solve the "power off" problem, I guess it might work with a /57 per CPE as well, and hope the customer long term only wants to have a single CPE.

Are CPE1-4 going to talk OSPFv3 between them on the link there according to the draft, or is this just for the CPE3/CPE6/CPE7 shared segment?

--
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: [email protected]
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to