On Jul 31, 2012, at 11:52 AM, james woodyatt wrote: > Also, the reason I proposed constraining the scope of a working group task to > handling just reverse DNS is that solving that problem properly will > necessarily involve solving a critical subset of the problems that need to be > solved to handle forward DNS as well. Do the reverse DNS case first, then > extending that work to cover the forward DNS case will be much easier.
+1 I'm a bit worried about the security implications of some of the ideas I'm seeing thrown around here, and would like to see us start with the basics and build from there, rather than trying to come up with a slapdash solution that does everything, and turns into a big problem in a few years time when it's deployed on millions of routers.
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
