In message <[email protected]>, Michael Richardson writes:
> 
> >>>>> "james" == james woodyatt <[email protected]> writes:
>     james> Also, the reason I proposed constraining the scope of a
>     james> working group task to handling just reverse DNS is that
>     james> solving that problem properly will necessarily involve
>     james> solving a critical subset of the problems that need to be
>     james> solved to handle forward DNS as well.  Do the reverse DNS
>     james> case first, then extending that work to cover the forward DNS
>     james> case will be much easier. 
> 
> This is a good approach. +1.

DH key exchange over DHCPv6 for the border CPE to get a TSIG key to install
NS / DNAME records for the assigned prefixes using secure dynamic DNS update.

All this requires is an appropriate DHCPv6 option to be allocated.

> _______________________________________________
> homenet mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: [email protected]
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to