>>>>> "Michael" == Michael Thomas <[email protected]> writes: Ted> You secondary a zone so that the contents of the zone will be Ted> there when a query happens, but why would a query happen if the Ted> CPE device isn't reachable? What would trigger that query? So Ted> I think you can get away with _not_ secondarying the zone. But Ted> if you do want to secondary it, why would the ISP be Ted> responsible for that? Presumably the customer is pretty savvy; Ted> a secondary for their reverse tree would just be another Ted> service they'd want to buy or set up, and the ISP could wash Ted> their hands of it or sell it, whichever they chose.
>> My suggestion is that the ISP secondary the zone from the CPE,
>> but actually advertise only their server in the NS delegation.
>> (The CPE remains a stealth primary)
Michael> Do you mean (in bind parlance at least) the CPE is the
Michael> master, and the ISP is the slave even though it's
Michael> authoritative?
Yes, and when I first started this thread, I had forgotten that
draft-mglt-front-end-naming-delegation-00.txt, says something very
similar.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
pgpJWhzOSg8d4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
