On 08/09/2012 07:24 AM, Ted Lemon wrote:
On Aug 9, 2012, at 10:17 AM, Kerry Lynn wrote:
That's exactly the point. mDNS isn't going away, so let's fix the issues
and leverage it as a basic capability.
NAT isn't going away either. Should we fix its issues and leverage its basic
capability as well?
(Seriously. Just because something isn't going away doesn't mean we should
standardize on it.)
It may not be going away, but it never had its debutante's ball either.
I just did a thoroughly scientific and completely non-anecdotal study
by conducting a rigorous and peer reviewed survey asking my friends
on facebook what they do when they want to configure their home router.
The results:
o typed in 192.168.x.x -- 3
o uses global name from vanity domain -- 1
o suspicious that this might be a trick question -- 1
o used a name that took advantage of mdns -- 0
Mike
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
