In message <[email protected]>, Andrew Sullivan writes: > On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 11:50:20AM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote: > > > There are enough services that require a working reverse for not > > registering to be a problem. > > Please name one.
Millions of SMTP servers or are we going to force SMTP MTAs to not use temporary addresses when transmitting mail? I know it is a useless test but it exists. Do you think ISP generate fake IPv4 reverse entries for no reason? There are just enough sites that do this that it is a pain to not provide the entries. > When we went through this argument in DNSOP some > years ago, we were unable to reach consensus on that claim. I'd be > delighted to learn it is true, but I haven't so far found a convincing > story. > > Best, > > A > > -- > Andrew Sullivan > [email protected] > _______________________________________________ > homenet mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [email protected] _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
