On 26 Sep 2012, at 15:35, RJ Atkinson <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tuesday, 25 September 2012, Teco Boot wrote:
>> It might be the right moment to come up with my earlier work 
>> on border router discovery. I have to update to incorporate 
>> the homenet-arch, and remove details for MANET/Autoconf. 
>> 
>> Intro & highlights:
>>  http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-boot-brdp-framework-00.txt
>> 
>> If there is interest, I'll resubmit for Homenet. 
>> 
>> Teco
> 
> Yes, please.  
> 
> Please don't remove the details for MANET/AutoConf,
> but perhaps put those details into their own section(s). 
> 
> The operational reality is that the IETF needs more tools
> for automatic configuration, zero or minimal configuration,
> site resilience in the face of upstream link changes,
> and also site renumbering.
> 
> A well designed tool for border router discovery ought
> to work well in MANET environments, AutoConf environments,
> ZeroConf environments, HomeNet environments, and probably
> also for renumbering events.  I think BRDP is very close
> to what is needed.  I would not want to lose generality
> of solution merely because it is being discussed in one
> particular IETF WG at the moment.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Ran
> 
> PS:  I'd also be quite happy to see BRDP go out as an
>    Experimental status RFC initially, whether through
>    the IETF track, IRTF Routing RG, or the ISE-track.
>    BRDP seems very useful and useful protocols tend
>    to self-deploy into environments where they are useful.

We also have Eric Kline's draft in similar space: 
draft-kline-default-perimeter-00.

Both can hopefully contribute to the solution for this problem space in homenet.

Tim
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to