Regarding all the discussion around this document I think a f2f discussion could help.
Would you please give us a time slot to discuss this during next meeting? Thank you, Damien Saucez On 11 Oct 2012, at 11:37, Tim Chown <t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: > On 1 Oct 2012, at 22:14, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> As far as I can tell, multihoming is not mentioned in the homenet charter, >> but it is discussed in draft-ietf-homenet-arch, without a clear conclusion. >> There is an argument for a specific analysis document on this topic, before >> we discuss our favourite solutions. > > A homenet arch -05 is about to be published. > > As Brian says, there is a brief section in the arch text about multihoming, > which we believe captures all that needs to be said. The section tries to > describe the architectural implications of different approaches in the > context of the architecture goals. For example, nothing in the architecture > should preclude use of shim6, if the hosts support it. > > If people have specific comments on 3.2.4 where this is contained, please > make them and we can consider those. > > Tim > _______________________________________________ > homenet mailing list > homenet@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
