On Oct 22, 2012, at 06:12 , Tim Chown <[email protected]> wrote: > > Therefore what seems to be on the table for homenet are: > [...] > d) NPT66 (RFC6296), which the homenet arch does not recommend, but see > draft-bonica-v6-multihome-03. > [...]
Why is this option still on the table? Who is arguing for it? Can we strengthen HOMENET arch to deprecate NPT66 explicitly? -- james woodyatt <[email protected]> core os networking _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
