On 10/23/2012 10:25 AM, Teco Boot wrote:
I'm not sure if giving each host a prefix in 2001:yyyy's address space is scalable either for the hosts, the SLAAC announcements, or just carving up 2001:yyyy's addresses, especially if you have a large VPN population. I've done that myself, and I have doubts that it's the right approach. I can't get why employer doesn't assign a 2000:: address to the server, other than test uRPF filters and get protocol designers crazy :-)
They ran of space in the 2000:: allocation? They merged two companies? There's lots of reasons why a company would have multiple prefixes. Mike _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
