Op 29 okt. 2012, om 18:21 heeft Michael Richardson het volgende geschreven:

> 
>>>>>> "Teco" == Teco Boot <[email protected]> writes:
>    Teco> More thoughts on this scenario. Assume the company has many branch 
>    Teco> offices (e.g. 1000 small sites, with 2001:xxxx::/48 from ISP), 
>    Teco> where main office has 2000::/48. Each branch office is equipped as 
>    Teco> a homenet, the gear is cheap and just acts as the requirements. It
>    Teco> provides Internet access and VPN to main office and indirect to all 
>    Teco> other branches. Branch office managers set up their homenet
>    Teco> equivalent  
>    Teco> to the branch offices. This doubles the number of VPN
>    Teco> tunnels. 
> 
> A question for clarification: the branch office managers setup the
> homenet at their *HOME* to talk to their office. (The fact that the
> branch office may or may not be a homenet is not relevant)
Ack

> 
> Lest anyone think that the Branch Officer Manager won't know how to do
> this, work in ipsecme right now attempts to automate this kind of
> on-demand partial mesh, and make it work cross-vendor.
I'm not so sure ipsecme and our wg products are compatible.

Teco

> 
> -- 
> Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to