Op 7 nov. 2012, om 19:29 heeft Simon Kelley het volgende geschreven: > On 07/11/12 18:21, David Lamparter wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 06:03:52PM +0000, Simon Kelley wrote: >>> On 07/11/12 15:46, Ted Lemon wrote: >>> >>>> I think the disconnect here is that people are thinking the routers >>>> to which prefixes are delegated need to themselves be delegating >>>> routers, but this is incorrect. What they need to do is _relay_ >>>> prefix delegation requests to the delegating router from which they >>>> got their own delegation. >>>> >>> >>> ... and once the delegating routers are relaying DHCP-PD requests, they >>> can also relay DHCP address-lease requests to the DHCP server in the CPE >>> router. This puts all the information about DHCP leases and associated >>> names in one place, and greatly simplifies the naming problem. >> >> This really falls apart when I'm using 2 ISPs with 2 exit routers. >> a-k-a, "Where's up?" > > and be put back together by noting that 2 exit routers doesn't have to mean 2 > DHCPv6 servers. A single DHCP server can take PDs from 2 or more upstream > ISPs. If the problem is that exit routers come with DHCPv6 servers, then > adding the ability to disable all but one (automatically or manually) would > be worth considering.
Multi-homing could be used for redundancy. Having a single DHCP server would not be the preferred choice here. Teco > > Simon. > > > _______________________________________________ > homenet mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
