On Wed, 14 Nov 2012, Randy Turner wrote:
Have their been any ISPs that have come forward to discuss their
consumer IPv6 allocation plans? I don't think we should wrap ourselves
around a model that says, "yeah, we need multiple /64s for consumers
because that's the way a particular protocol works (SLAAC). Maybe we
need another method. One /64 for a home network seems like overkill
regarding address space utilization -- A /32 would be overkill. I know
some folks think we have more address space than we'll ever use, but
gee….
Personally I don't see a way we can get anything deployed in any near time
if we abandon or try to change SLAAC. I don't see it as productive either.
/64 is what we have to work with. /56 per household scales perfectly well
when doing the math.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: [email protected]
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
