On 11/15/12 10:41 AM, STARK, BARBARA H wrote:
But when (single stack) IPv6 gets offered on that tether, that router will
only have a single /128 address. Hmm.
  > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-byrne-v6ops-64share-03 is one proposal.

Which, I suspect, is how the router would get that single /128 address. That 
works nice for the 3GPP tethering device to know it has a /64 that it can offer 
for SLAAC use to tethered (non-3GPP) devices to self-assign a /128. It's not so 
useful for my tethered (non-3GPP) off-the-shelf home networking router 
connected out its WAN port to the tethering device through an Ethernet/Wi-Fi 
bridge, to provide addresses to the home network on its LAN.
There are somewhat limited options in my understanding with 3gpp release 7 networks, this sounds like a relatively good idea given the limitations but it's use generally seems like kind of a bad idea. That said I'm in favor of bad options over no options, and I think it's heartening to see operators try and make this work.
Not all of the devices on my home network do Wi-Fi.
really only one of them has to in the case of a bridge,
  And even if they did, homing them all to point to the tethering device (many 
of which only support 3 or so tethered devices) would require effort.
The limit on the supported number of tethered devices is somewhat arbitrary, a usb dongle in business style cpe doesn't have the same limitations that my mifi does
  It's much easier for me to configure a single Ethernet/Wi-Fi bridge to point 
to the tethering device, and plug that into the WAN port of a regular home 
router. I know how to do this (in the IPv4 world). I could even describe to my 
mother-in-law how to do this.
I would agree that if it's not easy it's likely not going to workable general case. mobile phones that provide the bulk of the tethering capability already bind to the homenet (as clients/hosts) so they've already built the association necessary to offer service.
Barbara



_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to