Not sure I buy the security model angle, IPv4 NAT != security. It would be great if we had a group working on service discoveryŠoh wait!?
========================================= John Jason Brzozowski Comcast Cable m) 484-962-0060 e) [email protected] o) 609-377-6594 w) www.comcast6.net ========================================= -----Original Message----- From: Lorenzo Colitti <[email protected]> Date: Thursday, February 21, 2013 5:06 PM To: Dave Taht <[email protected]> Cc: John Jason Brzozowski <[email protected]>, David Lamparter <[email protected]>, Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, "[email protected] Group" <[email protected]>, Mark Townsley <[email protected]>, Jari Arkko <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [homenet] Running code in Orlando >On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Dave Taht <[email protected]> wrote: > >I still find the dynamicism required by renting ipv6 addresses to so >impact in so many aspects of the "sane usage of stuff like printers", and >naming, and the security model as to *demand* ipv6 nat in the home... > > > >Sigh. > > > _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
