On Feb 23, 2013, at 6:58 PM, "Brzozowski, John" <[email protected]> wrote: > I do not think the issue here is privacy or lack of interest in the same. > It is ensuring capacity is managed appropriately. Further, allocating > static blocks to everyone has an entirely different set of impacts that go > much deeper in the network beyond the home.
To be clear, what I was talking about is a policy of deliberately renumbering the customer in the absence of any operational need to do so, other than a misguided attempt to enforce a contract clause that some might describe as unconscionable. I happen to know that your company doesn't do any such thing, because I'm a customer, but I have heard of small ISPs doing this sort of thing with IPv4. I think the IPv6 architecture is quite robust in the face of such behavior, certainly in comparison to IPv4. But the point is that if this sort of behavior on the part of the ISP introduces some hiccups in the performance of the homenet, this is par for the course. _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
