On 22/02/2013 21:11, james woodyatt wrote: > This problem is precisely why I campaigned bitterly and vigorously against > the adoption and V6OPS and later the publication of RFC 6177. > > When there was still a consensus that subscribers should always get a /48 > prefix
I think you must have missed the bit where operators and RIRs around the world abandoned the /48 recommendation wholesale. 6177 simply recognised reality. I agree it's a shame, but it was not the IETF's doing. Brian _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
