Sent from ipv6-only Android On Feb 26, 2013 1:54 PM, "Cameron Byrne" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sent from ipv6-only Android > > On Feb 26, 2013 11:53 AM, "Lorenzo Colitti" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Ted Lemon <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > The alternative is basically a vicious circle: if ISPs ignore the IETF's advice and assign a /64 because they see additional address space as an upsell opportunity, then someone will figure out how to share the /64 by using ugly hacks like routing /128s assigned from DHCPv6. > >> > >> That might be what you imagine someone will do, but what they almost certainly will actually do is just bridge. Math is hard. > > > > > > Yes, bridging will work because if everything is on one link, DAD will avoid collisions. My point was that there is no way to do routing, even with NPTv6, unless enough address space is assigned to the network. > > > > > > Sorry for silly question. But ...is there a pointer to why routing is desired in the home ? Did homenet document usecases for this ? >
Ok. I see it in the charter. I dont find it particularly appealing or worth a great trade off for the level of complexity involved. Especially if the tradeoffs require nat66 or something similarly complex CB > Cb _______________________________________________ > > > homenet mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet > >
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
