Teco, >>> Reading the homenet-arch, I can't find how multi-addressed hosts are guided >>> to prefer one address over another. I think such facility is beneficial in >>> multi-homed homenets. >> >> the intention is to propagate the SAS/DAS policy given with >> draft-ietf-6man-addr-select-opt, >> and more specific routes learn on the border, combined with source address >> dependent forwarding. >> as well as rule 5.5 of 6724. > This will work when every access router is a DHCP server, right? What if no > DHCP or DHCP-relay? Do we generate this option out of routing information? Or > some other zero-config magic?
I don't think there is any intention of creating SAS/DAS policy on the fly. I was only thinking of passing that along to hosts. the homenet will using SADR ensure that BCP38 rules are satisfied. nothing more. I'm not sure what you mean by the DHCP question. DHCP has an option to pass SAS/DAS policy to hosts. I'm not suggesting DHCP is used to propagate that information around between routers in the home net. >> that's in solution space though. there is already a reference to the >> multihoming-without-ipv6nat document. >> >> do you have ideas of anything else we should add to the architecture >> document? > Maybe it is my reservations on the current suggested solutions. I don't > understand why we don't make use of ND. Then, access routers can provide > whatever they wish, from whatever source and the host can ignore or take some > benefits. again I don't quite understand what you mean. which protocol is used to convey network information to the hosts doesn't much matter in my view... cheers, Ole _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
