Wuyts Carl <[email protected]> wrote: > 4. the statement " Further, if the WAN link is numbered as a /64 from > within the prefix that (will be) delegated, that also would seem to > make the CPE's firewall even more complex, so I'd rather number it > outside the PD if it needs to be numbered at all." Agree that firewall > config might be more difficult, but don't forget that it saves address > space +, more important, injects less administration for the ISP to > keep track of prefixes.
Yes, it all seems way more elegate to do it that way. If you, as a CPE vendor are happy with getting such a thing, then, if one has to number that WAN link, I'd prefer to do it this way. I think that this might be a new statement on the homenet side. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
pgpYXRUN4ejNd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
