On Wed, 26 Mar 2014, Michael Richardson wrote:


I have read the HNCP draft, and while it is very rough, and lacks greatly in
the area of "how", being focused on the "what", I am happy with the WG
adopting it, and then improving it.

I agree. The mechanisms described in the HNCP documents seem good to me, I am not at all sure that the HNCP protocol as it stands right now is the best way to communicate the information the mechanisms need in order to do their job, but this is the kind of work the WG needs to do.

--
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: [email protected]

_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to