On Mar 27, 2014, at 2:19 AM, Ray Hunter <[email protected]> wrote: > So isn't the danger than HNCP starts off being very simple, and ends up > duplicating a lot of previous work and experience?
If the working group submits HNCP for publication and it's morphed into a full-blown routing protocol, I will send it back (assuming I'm still AD at that point, and also in the unlikely event that I didn't intervene when someone proposed adding the ful-blown routing stuff). I don't think anybody intends for this to happen, and if it does happen it will prevent the spec getting published, so I think we're pretty safe... :) _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
